Evaluating the impacts of fixing or estimating natural mortality, across life histories and data availability.

Claudio A. Castillo Jordan

November 12th, 2019 9:00 AM (PST): FSH 203

In integrated, age-structured stock assessment model, common practice gives us two alternatives on how to use natural mortality. First, to use a value coming from an indirect method and not estimate it. Second, natural mortality is estimated in the model simultaneously with other parameters. We used simulation testing with models simplified from real stock assessments to generate simulated data, using the ss3sim framework. The operating model “truth” included various levels of complexity, such as sex- and age-specific, and time-varying M.  Simulated data sets were used to investigate the bias and uncertainty in estimates of natural mortality and management quantities when assuming and estimating various levels of complexity of M in stock assessments, as well as the data sources that inform natural mortality by varying the type and amount of data available to the model. Given a large number of assessment models available and the range of data, life histories, and other characteristics that they cover, the results were evaluated to determine what characteristics are essential to be able to reliably estimate natural mortality. The uncertainty in the estimates of M was contrasted with the variation in the different indirect methods to evaluate in what context estimation of M inside the stock assessment model is an improvement over the indirect methods and in which cases it is worse. This study provides information about the overall uncertainty in management quantities given the uncertainty in M.

Combining fishery-independent and -dependent catch observations in a single index of abundance by allowing for spatially varying catchability 

John Best, Jim Thorson, Rick Methot, Andre Punt

October 29th, 2019 9:00 AM (PST): FSH 203

For fisheries where both fishery-independent and -dependent catch observations are available, spatiotemporally standardized indices of abundance currently use only the fishery-independent data because it is difficult to reliably standardize fishery-dependent observations. There may be an order of magnitude more fishery-dependent observations than fishery-independent observations, representing a currently unused source of information. Integrating these two types of data into a single index of abundance may increase precision, but the fishery-dependent observations would need to be standardized carefully to avoid unacceptable levels of additional bias. One approach to standardizing fishery-dependent observations in a spatiotemporal standardization model would include spatial and/or spatiotemporal random effects on catchability. A model that allows this will be presented along with preliminary simulation study results.

Brazilian fishery stock assessment and management: current status and challenges

Flávia Lucena Frédou – Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Recife – Brazil)

November 5th, 2019 9:00 AM (PST): FSH 203

There is a large diversity of species and fishing gear/methods in Brazilian marine waters, given the long coast (more than 7000 km long), with different environments and a multispecies and multifleet fishery. Most of the industrial fishing fleet is concentrated in Southern Brazil, while most of the small-scale fisheries (SSF) is concentrated in the north and northeast regions (Bertrand et al., 2018), where the activity is extremely important in terms of food security and employment (over 90% of jobs in the fishery sector concentrates). Based on a multi-year Brazilian research Program REVIZEE (Avaliação do Potencial Sustentável da Zona Econômica Exclusiva do Brasil), created by the Brazilian Government in compliance with the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, by the early 2000s, Brazilian fisheries far exceeded sustainable target levels in the main portion and the majority of stocks were either fully (23%) or over-exploited (33%) (MMA, 2006). Moreover, Brazilian Fisheries Statistics have not been reported since 2007, when the existing system was gradually dismantled and not replaced. Hence, the assessment and the management of the Brazilian fishery resources have been a great challenge for scientists and government.  After the Program REVIZEE ended, stocks have never been re-assessed at a national level. However, specific initiatives were established in order to assess the sustainability and conservation of some fishery resources. More recently (2010 – 2014), Brazilian aquatic resources have  been evaluated according to the IUCN Red List categories at a regional scale, in a process  leaded by the ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brazil). The red list, published in 2014 (Portaria 445), enumerated 475 aquatic species as threatened. Moreover, research initiatives funded by the Fishery and Aquaculture Secretary (Ministry of Agriculture) and CNPq (National Research Council) are in place in order to evaluate the main fishery resources of the country. This talk will review the initiatives of the Brazilian Government in assessing its stocks and the current challenge given the diversity and the data-limited nature of the national fisheries.

Quantifying Sablefish Movement and its Consequences for Fishery Management in the Northeast Pacific

Luke Rogers^1,2, Maia Kapur³, Sean Anderson¹, Brendan Connors¹, Sean Cox², Melissa Haltuch⁴, Dana Hanselman⁴

¹Fisheries and Oceans Canada

²Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University

³School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington

⁴National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

October 22nd, 2019 9:00 AM (PST): FSH 203

The consequences of spatial mismatch between fish stocks and the scale of management often remain unknown because stock structure is difficult to observe. For transboundary stocks, the difficulty is compounded because spatial mismatch may occur at political as well as ecological boundaries. Sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) are a highly mobile species that support valuable commercial fisheries. While their range spans the North Pacific continental margin, Sablefish are managed as independent stocks in Alaska, British Columbia, and the US West Coast. Although differences in growth rates and size-at-maturity occur across their range, low genetic differentiation suggests Sablefish constitute a single panmictic population in the northeast Pacific. To inform Sablefish stock structure, we ask: with what annual probabilities do Sablefish move among Alaska, British Columbia, and the US West Coast; have these probabilities changed over time; and do movement patterns suggest natural divisions between stock components? We estimate average and time-varying annual Sablefish movement probabilities among management regions using a Markov movement model and four decades of mark-recapture data. We then ask, does Sablefish movement undermine the performance of current management practices in these regions; and could alternative spatial management perform better? We plan to simulate Sablefish dynamics with harvest from a delay-difference operating model under contrasting assumptions about the underlying number of stocks (1–3), number of independent management regions (1–3), degree of juvenile movement between regions (low–high), and degree of adult movement between regions (low–high). This project is ongoing—we welcome feedback particularly to make inference from the simulation analysis management-relevant.

André Punt, Margaret Siple and Tessa Francis
October 15th, 2019 2:30 PM (PST): FSH 213

Progress on evaluating approaches for determining whether bycatch levels of marine mammals are sustainable

The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), which administers the portions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) pertaining to cetaceans and most pinnipeds, evaluates the status of stocks and issues regulations for reducing incidental take (bycatch) in US commercial fisheries. Within this regulatory framework, the Potential Biological Removal (PBR) level is a reference point for managing bycatch. NMFS regulations implementing the Fish and Fish Product Import Provisions of the MMPA require that imported fish and fish products be evaluated with respect to US standards. The regulations require foreign fisheries that export fish and fish products to the US, and are identified by NOAA as having fisheries that may incur marine mammal bycatch, to adhere to bycatch monitoring and mitigation standards “comparable” to those applied to US fisheries. An Ocean Modeling Forum working group has been established to develop a set of tools to aid countries in assessing marine mammal stocks, estimating bycatch, calculating bycatch limits, and reducing total bycatch to comply with the US marine mammal bycatch standards. As part of this effort, modelling frameworks have been developed to (a) examine the performance of the PBR approach in situations that are more broad than those used in its original formulation, (b) explore how well PBR-based management will perform for the case of harbor porpoises, harbor seals and gray seals in the Icelandic bottom gillnet fishery, and (c) estimate population trajectories for South American sea lions and fur seals in the trawl and purse seine fisheries for small pelagics off Chile, given uncertainties in bycatch levels and population size. This think tank will outline progress on each of these modelling efforts.